Your testing theory isn’t 100% correct in that you would need a steam tubine with a efficiency of 70%. I don’t know if they exist.

How can I go about biulding my own cavitation heater?

Bonjour,
je me nomme Eric, je travail en ce moment sur la le pojet de la pompe a cavitation depuis un an. Je suis content de voir d’autre gens qui soit interresser, car c’ait vraiment un bon projet pour la terre. J’aimerai bien discuter avec d’autre gens qui travaille sur la cavitation.

A la prochaine

The statment that the tesla turbine is 60-95% efficient is incorrect. It can be 95%+ if one only considers the blades. Including the inlet and outlets significantly reduces the efficiency. Axial turbines are normally in the 25-30% range with some in the lab at 40-50%. A gas turbine can have an efficiency in the high 80′s% for thermal conversion.

Also keep in mind that if the turbine conversion efficiency is 80% and you have a generator efficiency of 85% the total conversion efficency is 69%. Not enough for closed loop in this case.

I am sure that none of the companies building these professionally and selling them even consider that this is in anyway ‘over unity’.
If it was over unity, it would not need such a big honking motor and so much power to drive it.

170% efficiency has a theoretical explanation, and it is not a perpetum mobile!
Cavitation results in mechanical destruction of the molecules, and there is a possibility to increase energy effectiveness index of a process considerably when the molecules are destroyed mechanically. Mechanical destruction of water molecules demands only 50% of the energy needed for thermal destruction of the same molecules. Consequently, further fusion of the molecules destroyed mechanically, will release quantity of energy larger than that spent on cavitation. When this is the case, energy effectiveness index of the processes cannot exceed two, which amounts to the theoretical limit of 200%. The reported 170% is well within this range.

TO ALL WHO DREAM OF THE DAY!IT IS HEERE GENTS DONT BE AFRAID ,YESTERDAY IT WAS 130% TODAY ITS 150% TOMORROW ITS 200%
PLEASE CONTACT ME TO SELL ME YOUR INVENTIONS I BELIEVE IF YOU BELIEVE!

Lets be honest, it IS very simple to measure both the power in and the power out of that system. I’ve yet to see verifiable proof of the output power, just lots of people quoting 170% and saying “external observers have seen this”. Who are the external observers, did they set up their own equipment, or even know what they were doing, or were they just reading gauges and assuming? When this is proved in lab considitions by an unbiased team I’ll take great interest in it, until then it’s just another interesting bit of kit that works in a way that most people cant understand.

Dear Sir,
We are needs of the Cavitation Water Heater Equipment for 5000 liter water. Please inform us some Technical Dates and Delivery time to Mongolia. Best Regards Yalalt Sharkhou Director of the Mongolian Company MONELTECH. Tel 976 9909 6275.

The design shown in the pic would not be very efficient indeed. The small diameter of the “centrifugal” pump would have to be spun very fast to achieve the desired affect. And your right, the motor is to large. A larger unit would have more ports or hole and the rpm would be slower to achieve the same affect. Pairing it up to a smaller motor would definitely be an excellent idea. The nice thing about this heat pumps design is that it has very low drag making it surprisingly simple to spin. A motor as large as the one in the photo is only good for the power company….lol

I learn something new every day. Thanks for the hypothesis I look forward to reading further on the topic of cavitation.

Thank you

DAVE please keep me informed should you work up a set of drawings that would enable constructionof a cavatation water heater/pump Thanks

If this heater is efficient, why is it not produced commecially??

Why is this technology not shared??

LH

i here you may have some drawings for a cavatational pump i would love to here from you noel lynn

Purchased a on demand water heater a couple years ago and think its great. If you are thinking of buying one, do your homework the application needed for your climate though. They can save you a ton on your energy bills.

Check out http://www.hydrodynamics.com/ they are real and they are being sold commercially.

what keeps all the cavitating from destroying the metal?

A petition has been started on Change.org for the US Government to release electrogravitics to the public.

http://www.change.org/petitions/us-military-release-the-technology-of-electrogravitics

Why This Is Important

My early childhood was defined by My father’s excitement for His work in electrogravitics, then (1950′s) being worked on openly by all major aerospace companies. My father, a CalTech graduate and one of the top electrical engineers at one of these companies, would tell Me about the successes of His experiements (gravity control and overunity (free energy)), and tell Me what the world I would grow up in would look like.

Cars would fly, cities would float, and We would have all the energy We could use.

Then, one night He came home from work late and woke Me up to tell Me We couldn’t talk about the flying cars, the floating cities, the free energy anymore. “They want it secret for now.”

Since My childhood, I have studied economics, coming to the conclusion (later confirmed by Jeremy Rifkin in His book, Entropy) that all money represented was meaningful energy expended. One can grasp this most easily by considering the first hunter, fisherperson, gatherer, farmer, miner. The stuff They gained/used was free: critters, fish, fruits, vegetables, nuts, seed, sun, soil, rain, ores. It was the meaningful energy expended that gave “value” to the stuff: the killing, fishing, picking, tilling, weeding, harvesting, mining, transporting.

Add abundantly what money represents – energy – and the need for money (and the control of others it affords) in all its forms (barter, trade, work exchange, coin, bills, electronic funds…) will dissipate and what is left is free.

Add robots to do all the necessary jobs no One wants to do to free energy, and Humans will be freed to follow Their bliss – within the three Laws:

Do not willfully hurt or kill another Being
Do not willfully take or damage another Being’s property
Do not willfully defraud another Being

(A Being (cap the “B”) is sentient, sapient; animals are beings)

Waste would be virtually eliminated: supermarkets presently throw out hundreds of thousands of tons of food a month! Distributing by need and not profit will end this waste. Products would be made to last instead of being designed to break so as to ensure future sales. Theft-protecting packaging would be unnecessary. And so on.

Organic farming would be prized and GMO (genetically modified organisms) would be eliminated.

Motive for war will be virtually eliminated. With no profit motive for war suppliers and “infrastructure rebuilders,” wars will not be instigated to ensure profits.

Poverty will not exist.

Hunger will be eliminated.

Education (at all levels) will be free for all.

Replace the work “ethic” (a slave’s ethic: enrich the rich with Your Human energy) with a Betterment Ethic and the Humans who better things will be paid in appreciation, status, name-recognition and Self-satisfaction, the new “coin.”

Create a central website where problems can be brought up locally and People can “vote” to bump a problem up, down, show apathy by not voting, and chime in with solutions (which can be cheered and booed). Issues will drop off after the original poster indicates that the problem has been resolved or withdrawn, or there has been no activity after, say, six months (that is not set in stone). Social responsibility will be defined as spending 15 minutes a day examining issues on this site.

Also, issues with some set number of bumps up will be considered issues that need a wider awareness and go to regional sections. From there, continental, perhaps, and then global, as more are needed to be involved in solving the problem. Problems will beget the awareness to solve them.

Without money as a motive, problems will be solved more creatively, directly, harmoniously, and within the three Laws.

Leaders of the moment will emerge from this to solve problems as they arise.

Open-source all public works programming. This allows for many to make suggestions for betterment, and ensures that no one will create outside the three Laws. It also eliminates “back doors,” and other surreptitious software segments that bog down the clean functioning of the program. Without money as a motive, programmers will be proud to offer Their work for scrutinization and use, openly and freely. Status will be gained for creating the best programs.

Though this will not create a utopia, it will be vastly better than what We now have, in this scarcity-defined system, on this planet.